Posted on May 8, 2013
The timing of this last leaving is raising questions. The latest major departure is Frank Bisignano, the co-chief operating officer. The questions are about the status of Jamie Dimon, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of JPMorgan, the “persistent executive turnover,” and the up-coming board meeting where a debate is raging about whether or not Mr. Dimon should hold both top positions.
To me, there are two reasons for the recent departure events. First, Mr. Dimon is in control and he does not like what has happened inside JPMorgan over the past two years or so, with “the London Whale” and other events that have tarnished the “bravo” image of Mr. Dimon and his bank. The activity going on inside the bank remind me of a “turnaround” operation!’
But, there is a second reason for the things that are going on. Mr. Dimon is moving JPMorgan into the future.
If this is true, then this whole effort is to move JPMorgan into the future in the face of the “hostile” regulatory environment that exists, in the face of the changes that information technology are forcing on the banking industry, and the changing nature of the financial industry.
If I were Mr. Dimon, my feeling would be that the current regulatory environment “sucks”!
Being John Mason, my feeing is that the current regulatory environment “sucks”!
In either case, the basic feeling is that I really don’t want to run a bank. I want to run something different.
Second, whatever is being done in the financial industry, the future of commercial banking…of finance … read the rest
Categories: Alternative Financing, Asset Based Loans, Bank Credit, Bank Loans, Banking, Banks, Commercial Loans, Community Banks, Derivatives, Economic Growth, Economics, Fiancial Regulation, Focus Investment Banking, Focus LLC, Industries, Inflation, Innovation, Investment Banking, John Mason on Banking, M2, M3, Monetary Policy, Revenue Based Loans, Shadow Banking, Tranche B Financing
Permalink | | Comments Off on Winds of Change: Banking
Posted on May 6, 2013
In my last post I wrote about all the economic re-structuring that is taking place. Even though economic growth remains relatively tepid, changes are taking place in the economy that are going to dominate the future when the economy fully adjusts.
Maybe one of the reasons that the economy is growing so slowly is that the economy is going through a transition phase, like in the 1930s, where resources have to be re-allocated and re-structured in order for the economy to take off once again.
That is, resources are mis-located now relative to what is happening in the economy. For the economy to pick up its full head of steam, resources have to be re-aligned to fit what the economy is evolving into…not what it was. Economic policies that attempt to put resources…especially labor…back into the jobs they historically held…just doesn’t work!
Therefore, as I mentioned in the previous post, this re-structuring is creating tremendous opportunities for investment. But, one has to change ones perspective…and not focus on what was. This is why I found the recent article on the future of energy by Clifford Krauss in the New York Times so refreshing. The title to the article, to me, says it all, “By 2023, A Changed World in Energy.”
“If you could close your eyes for just a moment like Rip Van Winkle, and blink them open in 2023, you might see a very different energy world.
Electric cars may be popular. Solar energy could be cheap enough that millions of households and businesses deploy solar panels to generate their power needs. Fossil fuels will probably still dominate, but most trucks and many trains could run on natural gas rather than more polluting diesel. And the United States could be … read the rest
Permalink | | Comments Off on Winds of Change: Energy
Posted on May 5, 2013
The world is changing. The world is changing because it must change. When the unemployment rate hits 27 percent, as it now stands in Spain, something more is going on than just a business cycle.
Unemployment is also above 27 percent in Greece. In Italy, the unemployment rate is close to 12 percent. In France, the unemployment rate is above 10 percent. The employment problems in these countries are not just cyclical, they are structural.
The same for the United States. Although the unemployment rate in the United States is under 8 percent, the startling figure concerning the U.S. labor market is that the labor participation rate has dropped below 64 percent, a figure not reached since the latter part of the 1970s when women were not as big a part of the workforce as they are now.
These structural forces are causing divisions between countries as the world tries to recover from the Great Recession and more. Angela Merkel, German Chancellor, “highlights eurozone divisions.” The unemployment rate in Germany is 5.4 percent.
But, as we know, the utilization of capital in the western world tends to be lower now, for this stage in the business cycle, that at any other time in the past fifty years. Western countries are not only not using the human capital that is available; it is not using the physical capital it possesses. The competitiveness of the eurozone is an issue that comes up over and over again.
Phillip Stephens writes in the Financial Times about The New Deal for Europe: More Reform, Less Austerity. “High unemployment in Europe is not just a reflection of recession. It often mirrors ossified labor markets that lock out young people and discourage investment and innovation.”
But … read the rest
Categories: Bailouts, Economic Growth, Economic Stimulus, Economics, Energy, Entrepreneur, Euro, Financial Services, Industries, Innovation, Internet Retail, IT Services, John Mason on Banking, Monetary Stimulus, Robotics, Small Business, Software
Permalink | | Comments Off on The Winds of Change Are Blowing
Posted on March 3, 2013
Authored by John Mason – Originally Published at Seeking Alpha – Reprinted with Authors Permission
Behind almost all of the economic problems we are now facing is the need for economic restructuring. The world needs to move on and politicians and others are fighting to keep things as they are.
To me, this is one of the reasons why the common liberal/Keynesian solution to our current difficulties is more government spending, more stimulus. The common refrain is to push things right back into where they were. Push people back into construction jobs; push workers back into the auto plants; and push the untrained into information technology. Unfortunately, the world has changed. We cannot keep trying to push people back into the jobs they once held, or, push people into jobs they have not been trained for.
Everyone is excited about the boom in mergers and acquisitions. I have been among those, like James Less, Vice Chairman of JPMorgan Chase & Co. who said, “The Goldilocks era of post-crisis M&A has never been an if, but a when.”
For two years or more, I have been writing that the larger, better off companies, the larger money managers, are just waiting for the right environment to begin the acquisition binge. In terms of high profile the Dell (DELL) deal kind of kicked things off.
In the past two weeks, there have been at least four major deals announced. These have included the Dell buyout; the Comcast (CMCSA)(CMCSK) acquisition of GE’s (GE) stake in NBC Universal; the acquisition of American Airlines (AAMRQ.PK) by US Air (LCC); the Berkshire (BRK.A)(BRK.B)/3G Capital acquisition of H. J. Heinz Co. (HNZ); and the Liberty Global (LBTYA)(LBTYK)(LBTYB) … read the rest
Categories: Alternative Financing, Asset Based Loans, Bank Credit, Bank Loans, Banks, Business Acquisition, Business Sale, Commercial Loans, Community Banks, Derivatives, Fiancial Regulation, Investment Banking, John Mason on Banking, M&A, Mergers, Mergers and Acquisitions, Middle Market, Revenue Based Loans, Shadow Banking, Tranche B Financing
Permalink | | Comments Off on Coming M&A Boom Will Not Cure Real Economy’s Ills
Posted on March 3, 2013
Authored by John Mason – Originally Published at Seeking Alpha – Reprinted with Authors Permission
What do we do about the shadow banks or, more politely, alternative finance sources? David Reilly brings us some of the regulatory dilemma in the Wall Street Journal, “Too Big to Fail Casts a Very Long Shadow.”
The question is, “Should the U. S. Government look to backstop even more of the financial system than it already does?” The financial system is expanding. The financial system has already expanded.
Reilly writes that “the shadow-banking system is estimated at between $10 trillion to about $24 million, depending upon the activities included.” According to Federal Reserve System, the commercial banking system holds a little more than $13 trillion in assets.
According to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the total of all assets held by all FDIC insured institutions is a little more than $14 trillion. According to Gary Gorton, Yale economist, in his latest book, “Misunderstanding Financial Crises: Why We Don’t See Them Coming,” the shadow banking system totaled something around $10 trillion to $14 trillion in the summer of 2008, just before the financial crisis started.
In June, 2008, the assets of the commercial banking system totaled just over $11 trillion; assets in all FDIC insured institutions totaled just over $13 trillion. Alternative financial institutions are something to deal with. And, alternative financial institutions are attracting more and more attention.
The issue about shadow banking is one about systemic financial collapse. And, in other words, as Federal Reserve Governor Daniel Tarullo stated before the Senate Banking Committee last week, the regulation of this part of the financial system is the issue “we should be debating in the context of too big to fail.”
Reilly writes, “While banks have faced tighter oversight, the shadow banking market remains a … read the rest
Categories: Alternative Financing, Asset Based Loans, Bank Credit, Bank Loans, Banks, Commercial Loans, Community Banks, Derivatives, Fiancial Regulation, John Mason on Banking, Revenue Based Loans, Shadow Banking, Tranche B Financing
Permalink | | Comments Off on Damn Those Shadow Banks!
Posted on February 17, 2013
Authored by John Mason
“Bain & Company, the consultancy, forecasts a ‘superabundance of capital’ between now and 2020. In a recent report it argued that markets would be distorted by surpluses in Asian and Middle Eastern countries and private investment funds.
“It estimates that the world’s financial assets will outbalance its domestic product by ten to one – it will have $900 trillion of financial assets compared with $90 trillion of GDP – by 2020. The result will be a ‘world that is structurally awash in capital’ chasing few opportunities.
“‘Capital superabundance will increase the frequency, intensity, size and longevity of asset bubbles. The propensity for bubbles to form will be magnified as yield-hungry investors race to put capital into assets that show the potential to generate superior returns,’ the report concludes.”
These words from John Gapper appeared over the weekend in the Financial Times of London.
The signs of this possibility, according to Gapper, are two: first, the presence of lots and lots of cash on the balance sheets of corporations, hedge funds, and other financial interests; and second, the apparent movement in the buyout and acquisition market that reflects a growing belief among international investors that the US economy is stabilizing, the eurozone crisis has reached its final stages, and that elsewhere in the world economic recovery continues and capital flows are increasing. Apparently with these events, the desire to take on more risk has risen.
I have written for three years or so about the build up of cash on the balance sheets of corporations. Companies that never had issued long-term debt before took advantage of exceedingly low interest rates to increase their cache of money. The basic reasoning behind this buildup was that these financially sound firms would “make a killing” as the United States economy began to grow faster … read the rest
Categories: Banking, Business Acquisition, Business Sale, Economic Growth, Economic Stimulus, Economics, Federal Reserve, Financial Services, Inflation, John Mason on Banking, M&A, Mergers, Mergers and Acquisitions, Monetary Policy, Monetary Stimulus, Shadow Banking
Permalink | | Comments Off on Will a Superabundance of Capital Lead to an M&A Boom?
Posted on December 8, 2012
John M. Mason
The FDIC statistics for the commercial banking system are out for the third quarter. There were 54 fewer commercial banks in existence at the end of the third quarter than at the end of the second quarter. The FDIC only closed twelve banks during this time period.
The number of problem banks in the banking system dropped to 694, down from 732 at the end of the second quarter. Is the banking system getting healthier? This decline of 36 banks is a smaller number than the decline that took place in the banking system as a whole.
Over the past year, the banking system shrank by 184 commercial banks, the number fell by 455 in the previous twelve months. The banking system is getting smaller in terms of the number of banks, but larger in terms of the size of banks.
As of September 30, 2012 there were 6,168 commercial banks in the banking system, down 184 from September 30, 2011. But, the number of commercial banks with assets of less than $100 million dropped by 175 banks. Over the past two years, the number of banks in this size category fell by 350 banks.
Banks whose assets ranged from $100 million to less than $1 billion dropped by 17. Over the past two years the number of banks in this asset class dropped by 123.
Commercial banks with assets in excess of $1 billion rose by 8 banks. They gained 18 banks over the last two years.
In terms of assets, banks with fewer than $100 million in asset size declined by slightly more than 7.0 percent in total assets. Commercial banks within the middle range kept about the same number of total assets over the year, while those banks that were more than $1 billion in asset size grew … read the rest
Permalink | | Comments Off on Commercial Banking Industry Continues To Shrink
Posted on December 6, 2012
John M. Mason
Banking, in the past, has always been about people. Banking was built up around customer relationships and you had to have people to create customer relationships.
Banks needed people to relate to their customers, to entertain their customers, to solve problems for their customers and to smile at their customers. People, we were told, were the “face” of the bank.
But, observers of the actions taken by Citigroup argue that this is only the first step, according to a piece in the Wall Street Journal, the “opening salvo in a wave of cutbacks, business sales and other moves that could reduce the company’s global reach.” In another article in the Journal it is argued that this move “had better not turn out to be the whole show. Citi still needs reinvention.”
Departments need to go. Subsidiaries need to go. And, so on and so forth. The bank needs to be structured for the twenty-first century.
I certainly agree that commercial banks need to restructure. And, I certainly agree that banks need to become less of a “people” business. But, this is all a part of the evolution of the banking industry.
Let me begin with a true story.
In 1972, I joined the faculty of the Finance Department of the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. This department was one of the leaders in the “new wave” of financial research talking about “betas” and the “CAPM model” and other such exotic topics of the time.
My background was banking and there were no courses at the time at Wharton about the management or … read the rest
Permalink | | Comments Off on Citigroup Changes Reflect Banking Industry in Transition
Posted on November 20, 2012
The Financial Stability Board (FSB), a global financial policy group comprised of regulators and central bankers, just released new information on the status of the “shadow banking” industry. First, the FSB reported that from 2002 through 2011 the shadow banking industry grew by $41 trillion. Second, the shadow banking industry now is estimated to have $67 trillion in assets.
Note, as of November 7, 2012, the Federal Reserve H.8 statistical release shows that the total assets of all commercial banks in the United States amounts to a little less than $13 trillion. Third, the United States has the largest amount of shadow banking assets in the world, about $23 trillion.
Note, the share of activity based in the United States “has decline from 44 percent in 2005 to 35 percent in 2011.” The eurozone has $22 trillion in assets while Great Britain has $9 trillion.
What is a shadow bank? Lord Adair Turner, the U.K. regulator that led the FSBs work stated, “If it looks like a bank and quacks like a bank, it has got to be subject to bank-like safe-guards.” So, shadow banking is like pornography, it is what is in the eye of the beholder … in this case the regulator. It looks, therefore, as if we are in for another major round of rules and regulation for the finance industry … worldwide!
Looking for a job? I have seen many, many references to the health industry as the place to be if you want to get employed over the next decade or so. Looks to me like we have another growth industry here! If you want to get employed in a good steady job for an extended period of time become a regulator of the financial industry. Sounds like there are going to be plenty of jobs available and … read the rest
Permalink | | Comments Off on The Bankers Are Way Ahead Of The Regulators
Posted on November 20, 2012
So much of the world is in transition, why do people want the commercial banking industry to be what it was many years ago? This is just not going to happen.
As I have written many, many times, finance is information! We have seen, over the past fifty years or so how the advancements in information technology have contributed, for better or worse, to the innovations that have taken place in financial institutions and financial instruments.
Given the continuing advancements in the information technology field how can we not expect the financial field to continue to evolve? Check out all that is being done in mobile banking these days. At least in my area of the world I am seeing more and more advertisements about mobile banking and what it does for the customer.
And, this is just the ground level. More and more people you talk with and read about claim that they have only gone into a bank office once or twice in the past two or three years. And, the only reason they went into the bank was to complain about not receiving notifications from the bank that their interest rates were being dropped. If this is not enough, read David Wolman’s book, “The End of Money” (Da Capo Press, 2012).
But, who is going to even keep their money in a typical commercial bank? I don’t. I work with an institution that satisfies my banking needs and ties all my financial relationships together so that I can move seamlessly from one asset class to another almost instantaneously.
How about my mortgage? (Yes, I have one!) The commercial bank I know set me up with their affiliated mortgage that immediately sold the mortgage to Wells Fargo (WFC), which now just services the loan because it is owned by Fannie … read the rest
Categories: Alternative Financing, Asset Based Loans, Bank Credit, Bank Loans, Banking, Banks, Commercial Loans, Community Banks, Derivatives, Federal Reserve, Fiancial Regulation, Financial Services, John Mason on Banking, Monetary Policy, Revenue Based Loans, Shadow Banking, Tranche B Financing
Tags: Tags: Asset Based Lenders, Asset Based Lending, Asset Based Loans, Bank Lending, Bank Loans, Business Financing, Community Banks, Derivatives, Federal Reserve, Shadow Banking System, Shadow Banks
Permalink | | Comments Off on Evolving Financial Institutions